beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 59,900,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from June 24, 2014 to October 27, 2015.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties or may be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 1, evidence 2-1, evidence 2-5, evidence 3, evidence 9-1, 2, and evidence 10, evidence 6, witness C, and testimony of evidence 6.
On March 8, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a service contract with the content of the preparation of construction and civil engineering design documents and the acquisition of authorization and permission (hereinafter referred to as the “instant service contract”) by setting the service cost of KRW 130,000,000 in order to construct a publicly announced tele (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) within the 6,647 square meters of forest E (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”).
B. At the time of the instant service contract, the Plaintiff first borne the authorization cost (including the construction and civil engineering design cost) to acquire the authorization, and the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 130,000,000 to the Plaintiff after selling the instant land after obtaining the authorization.
The Plaintiff entered into a service contract with D with respect to the preparation of the architectural design drawings and specifications, and completed the preparation of the design drawings and specifications, using them, acquired authorization and permission to construct the instant building on December 22, 201.
C. Upon the Plaintiff’s request, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 2,10,000 as service price, KRW 4,00,000 on June 14, 201, KRW 4,000 on September 19, 2011, KRW 24,00,000 on January 6, 2012, KRW 20,000 on January 19, 201, and KRW 50,100,00 on KRW 50,000 on January 19, 201. The Defendant subrogated to the D in charge of civil engineering design that the Plaintiff should pay to the Plaintiff on March 5, 2012.
2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff completed all of the services under the instant service contract. Thus, the defendant shall seek against the plaintiff the amount of 59,900,000 won (=130,000,000-2,100,000 won-4,000 won-24,000,000 won-24,000,000 won-20,000 won-20,000 won-20,000 won-20,000 won, barring any special circumstance.