1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s KRW 96,747,00 and its KRW 88,00,000 among them, the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant)’s KRW 96,747,000 on April 9, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 10, 2013, the Plaintiff concluded a building remodeling contract with the Defendant on the same day, setting the construction cost of KRW 150,00,000, and the period of construction from January 6, 2014 to March 31, 2014, in order to remodel the said building into a pen, by purchasing the said building’s 803 square meters and the 155.7 square meters of neighborhood living facilities in the second floor of the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, a Metropolitan Government 803 square meters on its ground (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. The construction works stipulated in the above contract (hereinafter “instant construction works”) are as follows.

건물 2동의 전체 리모델링 전체 데크 설치 공사 건물 2동 지붕공사(칼라 장판 시공) 외벽(외부) 목재 시공 외부토목공사 및 냇가 주변데크 설치공사 지하수 관정 전체전기시공(내부) 옥내 배선 및 전등 설치 외부 데크 주변 전등설치 별채 화장실 증축(베란다 부분) 외부화장실 증축(남자소변기, 대변기 1개씩) 지하층 문짝 교체(한 동은 미닫이 시공) 외부마당바닥(건물부분) 도색 물탱크 보온처리 싱크대 설치 B동 벽면 80cm 편백시공(별채) 내부 옥상 도색(방수) 물가 진입로 계단 설치

C. On December 10, 2013, the Plaintiff remitted to the Defendant the sum of KRW 115,000,000,000 as the instant construction cost, and KRW 60,000,00 on December 26, 2013, and KRW 40,000 on January 24, 2013.

The defendant on February 2014

3. The first time proposed the additional construction work between the Plaintiff and demanded the additional construction cost of KRW 35,00,000.

E. On March 11, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the instant construction project to the Defendant by March 31, 2014, and the progress rate is less than 40%, and the items claimed by the Defendant are already included in the original construction contract, and thus, the Defendant’s demand for additional construction cost is unreasonable. Nevertheless, the Defendant already pointed out that equipment and materials in the construction site were already removed, and that the construction contract was already rescinded.