logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.03.15 2016가합1096
발전기금 반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 30, 2016, the Defendant’s Intervenor submitted an application for participation in the court as evidence, and submitted the identification number of the Defendant’s Intervenor (“C”) indicated in G as evidence. However, the Defendant’s Intervenor submitted from the Plaintiff the identification number of the Defendant’s Intervenor (“C”) to the effect that the identification number indicated in the Defendant’s identification number is different from that of the existing C. Thus, the Defendant’s Intervenor’s name is only the same as the name of the existing C. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant’s Intervenor submitted as evidence the identification number of the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor (Evidence No. 11) consistent with the previous C’s identification number as D. As seen earlier, the Defendant’s allegation that the Defendant is the same organization as that of the existing C. However, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge the identity, and thereafter, the Defendant was paid from each E.C. “C” under the name of the E. 275 million won in relation to construction work in additional mountain base on July 20, 2006.

C kept and managed the money paid by enterprises as the development fund for E-Eup residents, including the above money.

B.F deliberated on matters concerning the enforcement of the development fund kept and managed by C on the basis of the agenda items sent by C above;

C. F held a meeting on May 19, 2009 and passed a resolution stating that “The amount of KRW 800 million out of the development fund kept and managed by C shall be used as a unit development fund item, KRW 100 million as an item related to North Korea fishing (service charge) item, KRW 3 million as a book expense item, and KRW 468 million as a scholarship and balance item.”

The plaintiff shall be Ulsan-gun based on the Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of the Ulsan-gun Residents' Self-Governing Center in Ulsan Metropolitan City.

arrow