A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident) is a person who is engaged in driving of CMF3 motor vehicles. On July 24, 2013, the Defendant driven the said motor vehicle at around 08:00, while driving the said motor vehicle and driving the motor vehicle in the direction of a movable guard at the right direction of the Hanyang University, the Defendant moved the motor vehicle to the direction of the University in the direction of the 1152-Dong, Ansan-gu, Ansan-si.

Since the width of a road to enter through a bypass is narrow, there was a duty of care to make a bypass after checking the right and the right of the front and the right before the bypassing to a person engaged in driving service and checking the safety of the course.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected to enter the right intersection on the right intersection due to the negligence of bypassing it, and was driven by the victim D, which was driven by the victim D, to the right intersection, and received the back left corner part of the E-Caccom, into the front right intersection of the passenger car of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though the repair cost, such as painting 320,000 won is damaged to the rear side of the victim D’s scam.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) demanded from the victim D (the age of 48) immediately immediately immediately after the accident at the above time and place, but the Defendant did not comply with this demand and did not respond to this demand. As such, the Defendant examined the part of the Defendant’s vehicle as his hand and prevented the Defendant’s front front vehicle.

The Defendant continued to drive a vehicle and had knee part of the victim’s left side with the front knee part of the CM3 vehicle, which is a dangerous object in thought that the victim would be feasible.

Accordingly, the defendant uses dangerous objects to set up the left-hand side in need of treatment for about two weeks.