logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.06.13 2013고단702
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 26, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Incheon District Court's Busan Branch on April 26, 201, and a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the same court on July 4, 201, respectively.

6. 24. A person who was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor in the same court due to larceny, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on October 21, 201.

1. Each Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a wing and cargo vehicle B in violation of the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act.

On March 23, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on 0.148% of blood alcohol concentration around 19:00, while driving the said cargo without the driver’s license, and driving the said cargo at a speed of 0.148% on the surface of strengthening the roads in front of the Mapo-gu, Mapo-Eup, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and making a temporary stop.

Since there was a little slope at the time, there was a duty of care to safely drive the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, by viewing the front, rear, left and right, and accurately manipulating the steering system, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, committed an error in the operation of the brake system as above, caused the above cargo vehicle to be 1 to 2 meters down, and the part concerning the front part of the victim C's Dworketa car which was stopped behind the above cargo vehicle, was shocked with the rear part of the above cargo vehicle.

The Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, destroyed the above rocketing car to cover the repairing cost of approximately KRW 613,334.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, driven the foregoing cargo vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, at the same time and at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police with C 1.

arrow