The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Seoul Central District Court Panel Division.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: from October 30, 2012 to December 12:15, 2012, the Defendant 200: (a) took part in the old system at the luminous square in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu, Seoul, by the “National Disabled Persons Elimination and Co-operation”; and (b) took part in the old system; (c) from 12:30 to 15:45 of the same day, 250 participants in the above old system; and (d) from 12:30 to 15:45 of the same day, the Defendant conspired with the participants of the above road to interfere with the traffic flow of the vehicle across the center, such as the front line of the front line to the front line to the front line to the front line to the front line of the road from the front line to the six-lane road from the front line to the six-lane road from the front line to the road.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the adopted evidence, the court below acknowledged that approximately 250 persons, including the defendant, etc., who participated in the demonstration ( approximately 10 persons who participated in the demonstration) occupied the road of about 4 to 6 lanes from October 30, 2012 to around 15:45, without reporting to the chief of the competent police station, and that the vehicle from around 12:30 to around 12:30 on October 30, 2012 to around 15:30, the vehicle from the front of the citizen heat in the north of the luminous plaza, in front of the Tururg building, and the road from around 12:40 to 12:55, the vehicle from around 12:30 to around 12:30, 2012 to around 130:16, the police and the vehicle from around 1304 to around 16:14, the police, including the above vehicle from the front direction.