1. Main Defendant B: (a) KRW 101,012,754 against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related thereto from September 27, 2013 to September 15, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company with the purpose of manufacturing and selling secondarys, primarys, and civil engineering fibers, and Defendant B is a person who has engaged in retail wholesale business, such as clothing, etc. under the trade name of “E” in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

B. Defendant B allowed Defendant C to use the name cards as the director of “(State E”) E” and to engage in the original transaction of clothing in the name of E.

C. On March 2013, Defendant C used a position as a director of E, and concluded a contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for the supply of clothing originals (hereinafter “instant originals”) as indicated in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant originals supply contract”) (hereinafter “instant originals”).

The plaintiff from March 28, 2013 to the same year

5. From March 28, 2013 to March 28, 2013, the original Plaintiff, as shown in the attached Table, 155,156,862 to Defendant C, as shown in the attached Table.

5. A claim was filed on the premise that a total of KRW 157,437,672 was supplied by 24.24. However, the amount of the substitute amount set forth in the table Nos. 20 from 5,895,760 to 4,535,200 among them was reduced to KRW 1,360,560, and KRW 2,280,810 (= KRW 1,360,560) was reduced to KRW 1,360,560 according to the deduction amount of the company expenses set forth in the table Nos. 35 of the same table, and KRW 2,250 was reduced to KRW 920,250.

The sum of the original unit price (hereinafter “the original unit price of this case”) was paid KRW 54,144,108 out of the original unit price (hereinafter “the original unit price of this case”) as stated in the order Nos. 13, 25, 27, 37 through 40 of the attached table No. 13, 25, 27, and 37 through 40 from Defendant B, and the original unit price of KRW 101,012,754 (hereinafter “the remainder of the original unit price of this case”) remains.

E. Defendant C, after being supplied with the instant original body by the Plaintiff, was killed in the course of the process of manufacturing the finished goods in the wing company after being killed in the course of the process of manufacturing the finished goods after being killed in the wing company, had the original body and the finished goods manufactured using the original body and the original body of the wing company be kept in custody.

(f) related;