A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 14, 2016, the Defendant, at the parking lot of the “C” restaurant located in Kimpo-si B, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si on July 14, 2016, requested the Defendant to return home from E after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant wraps the Defendant and female, and demanded the Defendant to return home from E.

A bitch bitch bitch bitch, which is not a farch.

C. The term “C.S. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F., F. F.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., the facts against the defendant's wrong and the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment);