1. With respect to the land size of J-based 886 square meters for the plaintiffs, Innju City, Defendant F shall receive on November 5, 1994 from Suwon District Court.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant F, G, and H

A. According to the Land Survey Division prepared by the Land Survey Division established by the Land Survey Project, which was based on the Japanese colonial Rule, the land Survey Division 268 square meters of Kaju-gun K Forest (hereinafter “instant assessment land”) is indicated as having received L residing in the same Ri around 1912.

(2) The instant land subject to the assessment was cadastrally restored by Jinju-si, Jin-si, to the extent of 886 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(3) As to the instant land, the registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “the instant registration of ownership transfer”) was received on November 5, 1994 by Suwon District Court Branch No. 18971, the provisional registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “the instant registration of ownership transfer”) was completed on July 12, 201 by the Defendant G as of July 7, 201, as of July 12, 201, the receipt of the said support, and as of March 12, 2015, as of March 12, 2015, as of March 12, 2015, the provisional registration of right to claim ownership transfer (hereinafter “the provisional registration of right to claim ownership transfer”) was completed on March 12, 2015.

(4) Around March 11, 1942, M, the Plaintiffs’ prior to the death of the Defendant, N, South-North, inherited family and inherited property, and N died on April 8, 1969 and jointly inherited N’s property.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings

B. In full view of the following circumstances, the evidence revealed prior to the determination as to the cause of the claim, the result of the inquiry as to the leisure viewing by the court, and the purport of the entire pleadings, namely, L and the plaintiffs’ prior M, a title of the circumstances of the instant land, are the same as L and the Chinese character, the legal domicile of the plaintiffs’ prior M, and there are no materials to deem that M and Dong name were residing in the female-gun Pri at the time of the assessment of the instant land. In full view of all the circumstances, L and the plaintiffs’ prior M, a title of the assessment of the instant situation, are the assessment of the instant land.