A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around 01:00 on January 16, 2015, on the street in front of the D Main Ekh Center located in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, Cheongju-si, Doz. Whether the Defendant would not enter this d (22 years of age) to the victim F (22 years of age) who drinks with the table in the same university and drinks with the table in the above main shop.

“Although the victim was found to have been unable to repair ties in anti-end manner, the victim went beyond the bottom of the victim’s left-hand keel, and continued to go beyond the bottom of the victim’s left-hand keel, such as drinking and salvaging the victim’s head and shoulder part, or assaulting the victim’s head and shoulder part, thereby causing injury to the victim’s left-hand elel that requires approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the witness F and G in the second public trial record;

1. Statement of F in the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. G’s statement in the protocol of public prosecutor’s statement concerning G and the protocol of public prosecutor’s statement concerning H;

1. Investigation Report-12 - Attachment of a detailed statement of the processing of the case to be reported, investigation report- attachment of a detailed statement of the processing of the case to be reported, investigation report - attachment of a detailed statement of the settlement of the check card to be attached, investigation report - attachment of a photograph of the F on the day of the instant case, arrest report of the case, investigation report- attachment of field photographs, etc., and investigation report (Attachment of victim F mandatory record paper)

1. The medical certificate of diagnosis [it has not been consistent with the detailed part of the victim F’s statement, but has been consistently stated in substitution as to the background leading up to the dispute with the defendant or the fact that the left part was assaulted by the defendant.

In addition, the circumstances such as the fact that one victim reported the fact of damage to the police, that the victim was assaulted by the defendant, that the victim and the defendant expressed a divided appraisal before the police, and that the victim took an operation on the left-hand elel of the staff member immediately after the case, are consistent with the victim's statement (as claimed by the defendant, the victim goes beyond the congested one.