Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On April 23, 2012, Defendant A was subject to juvenile protection disposition by night, intrusion upon residence, larceny, etc. at the Busan District Prosecutors' Office, and on February 5, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of 500,000 won by larceny at the Busan District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

On April 21, 2014, the Defendants were willing to steal money and valuables by using the external windows of the “G” mobile phone agents operated by the victim F of the victim F in Gangseo-gu, Busan, where Defendant A worked, at the influence area located in the Busan City.

At around 05:48, Apr. 22, 2014, the Defendants came to the above G mobile phone agent, D gets into and waiting for a numberless taxi at a place less than 200 meters away from the above agency, and Defendant A has a part of the neck faceed well, and has a watched off the above agency’s external windows with a network, which is a dangerous object, and Defendant B has a faceed well, and got off the neck. Defendant B had a pipeed part of the neck face, and got into the above agency through the off-line glass, and she had a pipeed the 70,000 won of the market price at which Defendant A entered into the above agency through the off-line glass, and used money and valuables equivalent to the sum of 30,010,000 won of cash, etc., and 40,000 won of cash, etc., which were in the on-site for office work, and escaped on the above taxi.

Accordingly, the defendants stolen the victim's property together with D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. On-site photographs;

1. CCTV photographs;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing summary orders;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Defendant A with the reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution has the same kind of power twice, and this case is planned by the Defendants, who intruded the glass door of the mobile phone agency located on the new wall time zone, and stolen the mobile phone.