All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (eight years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The court below held that (1) The crime of infringing on life is an absolute value, which makes it impossible for a police officer to alter what he did, and even if he did so, the defendant should be punished strictly; (2) the defendant living together with the victim's house by tracking the victim's happiness; and (3) the crime of this case is very poor; (4) the crime of this case seems to have been committed; (4) the victim could have lost his life if a police officer did not appear to have been dispatched due to the report of B; (4) the victim suffered serious injury due to the crime of this case, such as damage of long-term and long-term and long-term conditions, which caused damage to the victim's life, and which seems to be considerable; (3) the defendant did not make efforts to recover damage, such as medical expenses for the victim; and (4) the defendant did not receive an application from the victim; and (4) the defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment for committing the crime of this case, taking into account the following circumstances, such as imprisonment with prison labor for the victim; (4) the crime of this case.

In full view of the factors and guidelines for sentencing expressed in the sentencing review process of the lower court, the lower court’s determination of sentencing is not deemed to have exceeded the reasonable bounds of its discretion.

(2).