Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000,000,000,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 30, 2016, at around 08:20, the Defendant listened to the victim B (n, 55 years old) who was located in Samsung Dflas A3’s station located in Samsung C, and heard that the Defendant’s intra-company smokes of this Defendant were not written off, and the victim was pushed the victim, and the victim was pushed the victim, and the victim’s two arms were tight parts of the victim’s body, and the victim’s two arms were carried out in hand, thereby taking about seven days of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B suffered injury, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, such as the date, time, and time, and at the place, as described in paragraph 1, the two descendants of the victim A (the 56-year old) and the franchis, were taken in one’s own hand and pushed the victim 48-day treatment of approximately 48 days on the left side.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Each legal statement of witness B and F;

1. A medical certificate of injury, each photograph [Defendant B]

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness A and F;

1. The defendant A asserts that there is only a fact that the part of the victim's left hand part of the victim's medical certificate of injury (â………) can be sweeted with the upper part of the victim's hand, and that there is no little difference between the victim's B and the two arms's upper part.

However, in full view of the fact that the diagnosis report on the injury to the victim B, the photograph taken on the day of the case, the witness F stated to the effect that “the victim B confirmed the injury incurred immediately after the case,” and that the victim B did not injure the victim B, or that the other person did not seem to know the situation where the victim B’s arms were cut off to the extent of the hole of the victim B, the criminal facts of this part can be sufficiently convicted.

② Defendant B did not reach the extent of the victim’s injury requiring medical treatment for about 48 days.

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the fact that there is no reason to suspect the authenticity of the medical certificate of injury, and the fact that the victim A actually received a considerable amount of surgery due to the pelvise, the victim A's act is about 48 days.