logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.04.09 2015고단15
사기
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents and the crime of uttering of falsified documents in this court, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on September 13, 2013.

The Defendant was refused to borrow a loan as security C, 401 Dong 401, which was owned by the wife B, but was rejected by B.

Therefore, in order to obtain the above apartment house-backed loan, the owner of the above apartment house, B, the defendant was allowed to receive the loan as if other women B, and received the loan from D who was aware of the loan through the people with mind, so that the defendant asked D to sign it only.

1. On January 14, 201, the Defendant submitted documents, such as a certificate of the personal seal impression, certificate of personal seal impression, identification card, certificate of registration right, etc., to E, who is a loan manager at the victim-Dongcheon-dong Saemaeul Community Credit Cooperatives, which was located in Chuncheon City, 121, and was transferred from the above E to the bank account (F) opened the loan transaction agreement by allowing D, who is aware of the fact, to enter into the loan transaction agreement, and make D enter into the loan transaction agreement and sign it on the 17th day of the same month from the above E to the trust account (F) established in the name of the above B.

However, in fact, C, 401 Dong 401, B, the owner of the apartment mortgage loan, did not consent in advance to the defendant's apartment mortgage loan, and there was no agreement for loan transaction or delegation of the preparation.

Accordingly, the defendant, by the above method, belongs to E, which is an employee in charge of lending the victim's Chuncheon Saemaul Fund, and acquired 60,000,000 won under the name of the loan from E.

2. On September 28, 201, the Defendant had D, as described in the preceding paragraph, prepare a loan transaction agreement in the name of “B” at the victims of the damage set forth in the preceding paragraph at the same time as that set out in the same paragraph at the same time as that set out in the same paragraph.

arrow