logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.10.06 2015누64833
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of some contents as follows, and thus, it shall be cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2, Part 15 "This Court" is dismissed as "court of the first instance", and the 16th " Results of a request for the supplementation of expert evidence" is added to "the results of inquiry into the Chief of the Seoul National University Hospital of this Court".

In the case of the Plaintiff at Chapter 3, “In the case of the Plaintiff,” there was no abnormal opinion from the brain wave test implemented by the Seoul National University Hospital on December 5, 2014, and there was no opinion to support the qualitative disorder even in the MRI test on the records of medical obligations in the Hospital (Records 5 October 2012) but there was no opinion to support the crymal disability in the MRI test. However, the psychological test conducted by the Seoul National University Hospital on December 16, 2014 is added.”

Part 3. 8 of the "International Disease Classification : ........................................................... .......... ........... ........... ........... ............... ................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................

It is evident that there is no evidence of obvious qualitative disease and functional impairment.

arrow