(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.11.14 2013고단2419

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.11.14 2013고단2419

상해등

Text

Defendant

B The Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, and a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 05:00 on March 7, 2013, Defendant A, while drinking alcohol together with the Victim F (FF, 44 years of age) at the “EM store” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, the Defendant: (a) demanded that the victim drink alcohol; (b) the victim did not comply with the demand; (c) destroyed the part of the victim’s eye off the floor by cutting off the victim’s inner diameter; (d) drinkingly, the victim’s fingers and hairs were cut off; (c) the victim’s fingers and hairs were frighted; and (d) damaged the victim’s cell phone located on the floor to inflict injury on the victim for about 28 days, such as cutting down the mouth and pel part of the mouth part; and (e) damaged the safety and mobile phone owned by the victim at the market.

2. Defendant B: (a) around 05:00 on March 7, 2013, at the “EM store” operated by Defendant D in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Defendant assisted F to drink together with A, a customer, for profit by having F drink.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Part of Defendant A’s legal statement to the effect that he damages the F’s cell phones and security at the time and place of the ruling and makes it at least once;

1. Legal statement of F;

1. Partial legal statement of G;

1. A damaged photograph, such as the victim face;

1. Mobile phone photographs, etc. damaged;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Defendant A’s determination as to Defendant A’s assertion regarding the part of the Eju store business license is true, but it was true that the F’s scam was scamed once in relation to the part of the injury, but did not see or see the scam or snow.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, F, such as F’s legal statement, photograph, injury diagnosis report, etc., the Defendant and the body of the Defendant complained of an abnormal increase in the inner part, such as the two parts of the body and the vision of the body of the Defendant. On the written diagnosis of the injury prepared on the date of the occurrence of the instant accident, F, in detail, was diagnosed to have caused injury, such as the impairment of the inner part of the two parts of the body and the outer part of the outer part of the outer part, face, face, and the outer part of the outer part of the body.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2014.02.11 2013고단2703

-서울북부지방법원 2013.05.22 2013고단556

-의정부지방법원 2016.10.13 2016고정957

-광주지방법원 2013.04.08 2012고단6982

-춘천지방법원 속초지원 2013.11.27 2013고단415