logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.04.14 2015고정2536
여신전문금융업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with labor for the obstruction of general traffic at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 1, 2015.

The defendant is a business operator of the trade name B in Gangnam-gu Seoul.

No person shall lend the name of his/her credit card merchant to any third person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while carrying on the business from Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1th floor (food and entertainment stores from April 24, 2014 to August 19, 2014) and from Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 503 (Do retail and electronic equipment from August 20, 2014 to October 1, 2014) with B, issued a false credit card sales amount of KRW 9,840,000 in the name of the Defendant of other member stores while lending credit card terminals under the name of the Defendant of other member stores.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written accusation and a statement of confirmation at the site of a suspected franchisor of disguised franchise by credit card;

1. Previous conviction: Application of the text of the judgment;

1. Article 70(3)6 of the relevant Act and Article 19(4)4 of the former Financial Industry Specializing in Credit Business (Amended by Act No. 13068, Jan. 20, 2015; Act No. 13068, Jan. 20, 2015; Act No. 1306, Jan. 20, 201)

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentence was determined in consideration of equity in the case where the judgment of reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was rendered simultaneously with the case where the judgment was rendered.

arrow