Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for six months, each of them shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, Defendant C, and Defendant D are the same month from November 6, 2019 to November 23:30 of the same month.

7. From 04:10 to 04, from the fifth sale office of the F Funeral home located in Jeju City to the victim G (ma, 48 years of age), the victim took part in several times and brought about money, and the defendant B called that she would make a claim to the victim immediately after the completion of gambling and return money. During that process, 60,000 won included in the victim's clothes were taken out, and the victim went out of the above funeral hall without considering the problem.

Defendant

B, Defendant C, and Defendant D thought that the amount of KRW 600,000 acquired from the victim after leaving the said funeral hall is very insufficient compared to his lost money, and they were frightened to return money from the victim by getting the victim back to the said funeral hall. Defendant B called the victim several times at the said funeral hall on November 7, 2019, but the victim called the victim several times at the above funeral hall, but the victim called “the return of money” at his own middle/high school and high school that did not receive the phone from the above funeral hall. Defendant A, who heard the contents of the call from the above funeral hall, was called “the return of money.” Defendant A was frighted from Defendant B’s cell phone with the cell phone machine from Defendant B, and brought about a son’s losses if you do so at present, so, even if so, it was frighted, and frightd and frighted.”

Accordingly, the victim returned to the parking lot of the above funeral hall around 04:50 on November 7, 2019 and returned from his own vehicle. The Defendants jointly carried the victim’s arms by hand, and Defendant B took the victim’s arms by hand, and Defendant C and Defendant D did not have any clear content as to this part of the facts charged. However, Defendant C and Defendant D did not have any clear content in the victim’s investigative agency’s statement.