The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the first instance judgment maintained by the lower court in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the objects and intent of the crime of intrusion upon residence.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal is permitted for the wrongful grounds for sentencing. Thus, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.