logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고정985
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No owner or user of a private-use truck shall provide such private-use truck commercially for transport of cargo.

At around 11:00 on October 6, 2015, the Defendant, using a private-use truck (BDaS) owned by the Defendant, transported freight to a factory in D located at the bottom of the Busan Sho-gu, Busan, to a factory where the trade name is unknown, and received KRW 7,000 as transportation cost and provided a private-use truck for transport purpose at a cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A written accusation and a statement of the detection;

1. Original Register of Automobile Registration;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 67 of the relevant Act and Articles 67 subparagraph 5 and 56 of the alternative trucking Transport Business Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (The fact that the defendant is a disabled person, the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime before, and the gains gained by the crime are insignificant, economic circumstances, etc.

arrow