logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2015.10.16 2015고단390
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving B cargo vehicles.

At around 13:20 on May 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle, leading D front roads in Einsan City to the sub-Korean apartment from the opposite side of the dialogue apartment.

Since there is an intersection where signal, etc. is not installed, a person engaged in the driving duty has a duty of care to check whether a motor vehicle is cross-sectioned by reducing speed or temporarily stopping, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went directly to the left side of the mastal direction by the negligence of the Defendant, and received the front part of the said cargo driving by the victim E (the 75-year-old) who drives from the port side of the Madsan bus terminal to the Madsan bus terminal.

Ultimately, around May 12, 2015, the Defendant caused the victim's death by the occupational negligence as seen above, from the H hospital located G in Seosan-si G on May 12, 2015, the Defendant caused the victim's death by dubation and dubal cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebr

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a traffic accident report, a field photograph of the accident, a death certificate, a postmortem report, a comprehensive traffic accident analysis report, and a detailed investigation report;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

2. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to detention in the workhouse is that the Defendant caused the death of the victim by causing a traffic accident as stated in its reasoning, and thus, its illegality cannot be said to be small.

However, there is a confession that the defendant has committed a crime, and that the bereaved family of the victim has agreed to pay 30,000,000 won to the bereaved family of the victim, and that the bereaved family of the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant (see the evidence record 47,50, 50).

arrow