The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The Defendant asserts that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as the grounds for appeal of this case are too unreasonable.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case and the fact that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, since the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the following is ruled again

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the criminal facts of the defendant recognized by this court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the corresponding columns of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they shall be quoted by Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148, 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (a punishment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a punishment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes which are heavier than any other punishment, a violation of the Road Traffic Act and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (a without a license) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act which are heavier than any other punishment);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. From among concurrent crimes, Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the long-term punishment of the crimes above two crimes)

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1,