Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 2013, the Defendant: (a) took care of one copy of the SC credit card owned by the victim, which was kept in his/her safe at the D office, a company operating the victim C, located in the Gu-dong, during Ansan-si; and (b) considered to be used by himself/herself.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

2. On July 8, 2013, the Defendant in violation of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business purchased goods worth KRW 3 million from E “E” around July 8, 2013, and used stolen credit cards, such as the use of stolen C’s SC credit cards, as stated in the list of crimes, from that time until March 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports ( telephone conversations between complainants);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 70 (1) 3 of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business (a comprehensive use of stolen credit cards), and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is not less than that of a crime, various sentencing conditions should be taken into account, such as the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant, that the card payments used by him are fully repaid, and that there is no previous conviction in the same way.