Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 6, 2014, at around 23:50, the Defendant driven a CM car under the influence of alcohol of 0.182% from the water direction of the water direction to the roads of 824 Dominin apartment complex of the same kind from the Yong-gu Incheon Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Incheon via the nivem light.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the prior notice of disposition for driver license cancellation;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the cost of lawsuit against the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, without explaining that the police officer may refuse the defendant's voluntary movement, and the defendant forced to take a drinking test. The result of the drinking test conducted in an illegal forced conduct constitutes illegally collected evidence, and thus, it is not admissible. Thus, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the police officer D, etc., who called upon the defendant's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's drinking condition after confirming the defendant's drinking condition through the drinking reduction method, and notified the defendant of the fact that he could refuse the voluntary movement and that he could move into the zone. In addition, it appears that the defendant's ability to understand the meaning at the time of receiving the above notice and to judge whether the defendant's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's wife should comply with it.