The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the value of stolen oil does not exceed the value of the stolen oil, and some of the crimes are attempted, and the victims of the larceny are compensated for damage and agreed.

However, the Defendant may repeatedly and repeatedly commit the instant crime through the tools prepared in advance, and may be subject to criticism.

In addition, the Defendant, prior to the instant case, was punished for larceny 11 times, and in particular, committed the instant crime on December 9, 2015 without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for 6 months on December 9, 2015.

In addition, the sentence imposed by the court below is not heavier in light of the records of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, and family relationship, and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the change of the records of this case.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.