The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (4 months of imprisonment and 40 hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects the mistake are considered favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant by taking the hand of the victim who was divingd in the sobry water surface room, by taking the hand of the victim, and by taking her hand into the victim's lower part, and committing an indecent act by taking her part, in light of the method and contents of the crime, etc., the nature of the crime is grave, the defendant did not take any particular measures to recover damage, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspension of execution due to the crime of violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (rape, etc.), and all other sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.