A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a partner of C, who died from the death of the end cancer around December 2017, and the victim D was in a de facto marital relationship with C.

The victim had resided together with the above C for about 10 years at the house located in the Republic of Korea F, which was the ownership of the Sindoe E before approximately eight years ago. The Defendant decided to own the said house solely by agreement with the other inheritors immediately before the death of C, but the above house was not completed registration.

1. Special intrusion upon residence, interference with exercise of rights, and special intimidation, the Defendant was unable to send the victim’s intention to the above C, requiring the victim to change 5 million won, which is part of the death insurance money of the above C, under the pretext of the removal cost, but the victim was rejected, with a view to preventing the victim from killing at the house living together with the above C, the Defendant was suffering from the window, which is a accessory to the above house, in order to prevent the victim from killing at the house.

On January 26, 2018, at around 14:40, the Defendant: (a) was the victim’s house residing in the Southern Bosung-gun F, and the damaged party’s market price, which is a dangerous object inserted in the warehouse, damaged the Defendant’s landless boiler window, small bank window, and small bank window.

The defendant continued to have inserted the door, which is a dangerous thing to confirm out of the victim's speech, and entered the house, and then whether the victim's "it is not a 5 million won if the victim did not have any such day."

The phrase “the victim was frightened by breaking the Defendant’s market value, which is the Defendant’s possession, the window or large-scale window, and frightened to the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles into the victim's residence, and damaged the window, which is the object of the victim's right, and obstructed the victim's exercise of right, and threatened the victim by carrying dangerous articles.

2. Intrusion upon residence, interference with the exercise of rights, damage to property, and the defendant are all damaged by a victim of theft, and at the above house.