1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 25, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that the Plaintiff’s son B (hereinafter “the deceased”) died due to the occurrence of brain species (hereinafter “the instant wound”) due to education and training during military service and performance of duties.

B. On January 27, 2014, the Defendant rendered a notification of the Plaintiff on the ground that “this case’s wound is difficult to be recognized to have been caused or aggravated due to education and training and performance of duties while in military service,” following the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement’s requirements related to official duties, on the ground that the instant wound did not have causation with the performance of official duties, the Defendant did not constitute a soldier or policeman wounded on duty, and the Defendant

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Before the Plaintiff’s assertion entered the Gun on May 30, 201, the Plaintiff did not appeal to, or receive medical treatment of, the symptoms related to the instant injury, the deceased was judged to have been suffering from the injury of this case for a period of three months after the removal, the deceased was subject to physical and mental stress due to excessive work, and the deceased was unable to undergo an appropriate inspection and medical treatment even though he complained of symptoms similar to the symptoms of the instant injury during his military service. In light of the above, the injury of this case was caused or aggravated by the deceased’s military performance or education and training. Thus, the instant disposition was unlawful on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation between the deceased’s duties and the instant injury.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. (1) The Deceased entered the Army on May 30, 201, and discharged on February 28, 2013. (2) The Deceased did not receive special medical treatment due to symptoms such as the pre-entry bat, etc.

3 The Deceased.