Text
1. From March 25, 2015, the Defendant indicated the attached Form No. 5, 6, 7, 8, and 110,124 won to the Plaintiff and from March 25, 2015, C Forest Land No. 2523 square meters to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is the owner or interest of 440 square meters (hereinafter “D”) prior to D in Si-si, Si-si, and the owner or interest of 2/3 of the 2523 square meters of C Forest in Si-si, Si-si (hereinafter “C Forest”).
B. On September 17, 2013, the Defendant purchased the F forest land 2623 square meters from Siri-si, Siri-si, in the purchase price of KRW 700 million and completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 8, 2013.
On December 9, 2013, the Defendant extended and reconstructed the existing housing located on the ground by obtaining permission on the extension, remodeling, and alteration of the use of the building with a total floor area of 298.47 square meters on the above F Forest ground, which is located within the development-restricted zone from Si-si.
In addition, on January 15, 2014, the Defendant completed the registration conversion of G forest land of 2447 square meters with respect to the said F forest of 2623 square meters. On January 20, 2014, the Defendant divided the said G forest of 330 square meters into four parcels, including G forest of 330 square meters, H forest of 1802 square meters, I forest of 261 square meters, I forest of 54 square meters, and J forest of 54 square meters. On March 24, 2014, the Defendant changed the land category of G forest of 330 square meters into “site” and the land category of 1 forest of 261 square meters into “road”, respectively.
(hereinafter referred to as “the instant franchise” in this case).
Since there is no passage to enter the franchise of this case as a contribution, E, the former owner of the franchise of this case, has used the parts of the attached Form (b), (c) (hereinafter referred to as the "attached Form") which have been used for a long time for a contribution to the franchise of this case and the parts (e) which link the franchise of this case, as a passage. The Plaintiff used the parts (d), (g), and (f) as a large truck for the implementation of the factory extension construction on the franchise of this case. The portion (f) after completion of the construction work, after the completion of the construction work, has been restored to its original state, and currently has used the part (d), (e), and (f) (hereinafter referred to as the "the part of the access road of this case").
The access road of this case is three meters wide.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-7 evidence (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap 8 evidence.