1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. B (C) entered the Gun on December 15, 2015, and served as the 58 B B soldiers in the 15th unit of the Bos Disease Group 58 B, and died of the following circumstances (hereinafter “the Deceased”). On January 9, 2017, the duty officer finds the head around 18:30, and asked “I would be able to remove his/her duty” and “I would be able to remove his/her duty.”

As a result, he was put in his service and carried out the guard duty of the first place of carbon, but he said that he was not aware of his hand, and that the temperature was seld.

After completing the boundary duty, the watch keeping officer reported to the watch keeping officer on the ground that he did not know about the right arms, he was sent to D hospital after going through the stage of an association, and was diagnosed by brain-resistant transfusion on January 10, 2017, and received around 04:15 around 201.

D Hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's hospital's 05:05 on January 20, 2017, and died due to cerebral cerebral cerebralcular, fladism, and cerebral mala.

B. Upon recognition of the deceased’s death sentence III as a result of the review of his/her major thought, E, the deceased’s mother’s spouse, the deceased’s spouse, applied for the registration of his/her bereaved family on March 13, 2017 as a person of distinguished service to the State; and

8. 18. The Defendant did not meet the requirements for distinguished service to the State, but was determined to meet the requirements for persons eligible for veterans’ compensation.

(c)

As above, the Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the disposition that was not recognized as a soldier on duty, and filed a lawsuit seeking its revocation as the District Court 2018 Guhap 12584, but the Plaintiff was declared dismissed on March 28, 2019, and thus, the Plaintiff was not eligible as the Plaintiff. The court’s medical record appraisal result at the time determined as follows.

In the case of a large amount of brain dystrophism, the cerebral dystrophism is serious, and as a result of computerized dypology of brain (CT), the movement of cerebral dystrophism has occurred, and the movement of cerebral dystrophism has led to brain dystrophism by pressure.

The Deceased on June 1, 201.