logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고단4571
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On May 22, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-cheon, which is a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the same court on June 11, 2010, a summary order of KRW 3.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) in the same court on August 25, 2010, a summary order of KRW 3.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) in the same court on November 30, 2010, and a person who has driven two or more times after having received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) in the same court on November 30, 2010.

[Criminal facts] On July 11, 2017, the Defendant driven D rocketing car while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.054% at the distance of approximately 200 meters from the 200 meters to the road near the Gyeongnam Saemaul Undong, the Gyeongdong-gun, Gyeongdong-gun, the Gyeongdong-gun, an Eup of North Gyeongdong-gun, the Gyeongdong-gun.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of written inquiries about criminal history and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the provisional payment order are as follows: (a) considering all of the factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered.

Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant has a record of being punished by imprisonment with prison labor, etc. on 16 occasions for the same kind of crime (which has been punished by a fine on four occasions due to drinking driving, etc.) and on May 28, 2014.

arrow