Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) Of the first floor of the building listed in the separate sheet, each point is indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 25, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the lease deposit of approximately KRW 19.8 square meters (hereinafter “the part of the instant building”) on the part (A) connected with each of the items in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 among the 1st floor of the building indicated in the attached Table owned by the Plaintiff, with the lease deposit of KRW 3 million, monthly rent of KRW 2,50,000 (payment after January 15), from January 25, 2016 to January 24, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The Plaintiff agreed that the lease agreement may be terminated immediately if the overdue amount reaches the rent of three (3) years.
B. On January 25, 2016, the Defendant paid a lease deposit of KRW 3 million to the Plaintiff in accordance with the instant lease agreement, and received delivery of the instant building part from the Plaintiff, and from that time, operated a building office with the trade name “C” until the date of closing the argument in the instant case, and occupied and used the said building part.
C. As the Defendant did not pay the rent for August 8, 2016 by October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff paid the remainder of the overdue rent to the Defendant by October 31, 2016.
If the lease contract of this case is not implemented, it shall be terminated automatically, and the above content-certified mail reached the defendant at that time.
However, even after the Defendant continued to pay the monthly rent to the Plaintiff.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 5, Eul evidence 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. According to the facts of determination as to the claim for delivery of the part of the building of this case, barring any special circumstance, the lease contract of this case was terminated by the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention of termination on the ground that the Defendant was in arrears of not less than three years, barring any special circumstance. Thus, the Defendant is the part of the building of this case to the Plaintiff.