logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.08.12 2015고단1547
절도
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From the end of November 2014 to the end of December of the same year, Defendant A was working as an employee at the 'F' mobile phone sales store in Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City from the end of November 2014 to the end of December 12, 201, Defendant A stolen the total amount of KRW 6P-16GG, equivalent to the market price of KRW 789,800, KRW 789,00, KRW 60-16G, KRW 789,80, KRW 789,000, KRW 789,000, KRW 6P-16GD, market price of KRW 924,00, KRW 924,00, KRW 16GD, market price of KRW 957,00, KRW 910, KRW 597,70.

2. On May 7, 2015, Defendant B sentenced Defendant B to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Resident Registration Act, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 15, 2015.

On September 4, 2014, while working as an employee from the ‘F' mobile phone sales store in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, as of September 4, 2014, the Defendant used 31 LG G31 at the same place as of 600,000 won in the market price, and used 70,000 won in the same place around the 5th day of the same month and used 3,230,000 won in the total of 3,50,000,000 won in the gallon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seoul, as of 80,000 won in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. The case explanatory statement, etc. submitted by the victim;

1. Previous convictions: Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 2833 Court Decision, Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2015No155 Court Decision, and application of statutes of the Commercial Inquiry Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime: Each of the Defendants is subject to imprisonment.

1. Defendant B who handles concurrent crimes: The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the community service order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A

(a)the sentencing criteria;

arrow