The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The diagnosis of injury by the E hospital for the victim of mistake of facts is written in the victim's code of disease, which is not an injury, rather than an injury to the victim's stroke, and the victim did not receive internal medical treatment from August 2014 to August 2017, but it appears that the victim's strokes were not discovered, and the degree of the victim's assault was not significant to the extent that the victim did not contain any statement that the strokes were involved in the head or part of the strokes in the medical record of the victim. Nevertheless, if the victim suffered strokestrokes, it is reasonable to deem that there was no causal relationship between the victim's assault and the victim's injury.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B. The Defendant had a mental disorder under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.

C. The sentence of the judgment of the court below on unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case on the following grounds: (i) the victim visited Ald E Hospital on the day following the instant crime and received hospitalized treatment after being diagnosed with her Hedal brain stroke; (ii) the victim did not confirm other factors than the instant crime since he had not received treatment in the past three years prior to the instant crime; and (iii) the brealogal stroke may occur due to external wounds; and (ii) the Defendant’s assault and the injury suffered by the victim; and (ii) the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court.