A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

After the defendant became aware of the deceased's spouse D's pro-Japanese E, the defendant was committed as if the defendant had the ability to arrange employment as a former public official in the correctional post, but the fact was a person who has no career as a public official and has no ability to appoint a person in the correctional post.

In 2012, while the defendant was considered as hospital expenses for the spouse in around 2012, the victim C from the Dong F of E and E, her husband G of F, "A children continue to keep away from the examination of correctional officers, and is being considered as employment issues.

“The purpose of this study is to use money for the purpose of receiving money by visiting the job placement of the recipient of the introduction.”

Accordingly, the defendant, on November 2012, intends to appoint children as class 7 special bonds of correctional service through a telephone to the victim residing at H of the Y of the Y of the 2012.

F The F shall be appointed to class 9, and the children of the victim shall be given more money of class 7.

“Around November 13, 2012, when making a false statement, the Plaintiff demanded money as a solicitation for appointment as a correctional officer, and received KRW 10 million from the injured party to the bank account (I) of the Defendant’s name on November 13, 2012, and transferred KRW 5 million to the bank account of the said Defendant via the Agricultural Bank Account (J) in the name of F on March 27, 2013, and received KRW 5 million from the said Defendant’s name on November 7, 2013.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victims, received a total of KRW 20 million from the victims, and received money and valuables equivalent to the same amount under the pretext of solicitation for the appointment of correctional officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Three copies of a transaction statement, and the details of each account transaction, and the paper of the document;

1. Application of each record, CD ( cellular phone recording file)-related statute;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime (the point of fraud, the point of fraud).