logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2013.06.26 2012고정220
약사법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who establishes and operates a pharmacy with the trade name “D Pharmacy” in the Chungcheong City, and E is a person who establishes and operates a medical institution with the trade name “G Council members” in the Chungcheong City.

1. Around June 30, 2009, the Defendant: (a) at the “D pharmacy operated by the Defendant in Chungcheongnam-si; (b) did not have received a direct medical examination from the Plaintiff, a doctor of G; (c) in contact with the said G Council, the Defendant issued a false prescription as if the said E had diagnosed H; and (d) made it easier for the Defendant to violate the Medical Service Act by means of preparing for 30 days the said H, the compact, disks, and the ethition, which may be administered for 30 days according to the prescription.

2. On April 7, 2010, the Defendant issued a false prescription as if the above E had diagnosed patients I with the above method at the place under the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, and made it easier for the Defendant to violate the Medical Service Act of the above E in a manner of preparing Rorogate, clycera, clycera, lusule, lusule, lusule, and lusule, which can be administered to the above I for two days in accordance with the prescription.

3. On April 7, 2010, the Defendant issued a false prescription as if the above E had diagnosed the patient J at the place under the above Paragraph (1) of the same Article, and, according to the prescription, made it easier for the Defendant to commit the above violation of the Medical Service Act by preparing Triprotex, Kadifin, Kadifin, didine, Makafin, and the test that can be administered for 30 days to the saidJ.

4. On April 7, 2010, the Defendant issued a false prescription as if the above E had diagnosed the patient K with the above method at the place under the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, and made it easier for the Defendant to violate the Medical Service Act of the above E, by preparing flacacs which can be administered for four days in accordance with the prescription.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of L, E, M, or N;

1. Certificate of the establishment of a pharmacy;

arrow