logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.05.13 2012고단3583
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 28, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Changwon District Court on April 28, 2004, and the execution of the said punishment was terminated on June 25, 2005.

1. Around 15:00 on February 3, 2006, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he wanted to dispose of the DtraxG car that the victim of the sexual arrest victim C was going to a foreign country in front of the Seongdong-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, and that he would make the victim pay to the head of the Tong for the next day the amount of KRW 15 million after the vehicle's sale price is higher than the sale price.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if the vehicle was transferred by the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained from the victim the above vehicle in the amount of KRW 9.8 million at the market price from the victim, and acquired it by fraud.

2. The Defendant, at Changwon-si, committed as if he followed the above contract even though the Defendant was not in a state of receiving the contract for removal of the brine, and even though it was not highly likely to receive the contract, to the victim G and H operating the Fhands Award located in E; and

A. A. On May 1, 2008, the victim H made a false statement that “I wish to give water coming from the removal of the brine construction work. I change one million won with prepaid money” at the construction site in the fluorial seat of the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and then I acquired cash from the victim H, i.e., one million won, from the victim H;

B. Around May 6, 2008, at the above Franchis office, the victim G loaned KRW 3 million to the victim G as the money is required to prepare a contract for the removal of brins. It is false to say that it would be repaid in lieu of water if it is lent. It is so obtained from the victim G, that is, from the victim G, from the transfer of KRW 3 million to the post office account in the name of I designated by the Defendant; and

C. On May 13, 2008, in places such as the preceding paragraph, the personnel expenses must be paid to the victims H who were mobilized to remove the brine.

arrow