The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant was unable to accurately recognize whether he was killed in the 119 first-aid vehicle, whether he was killed in the hospital’s first-aid vehicle, and whether he was killed in the hospital’s first-aid vehicle. Furthermore, the victim was 119 fire fighters due to Corrona, and the victim was unable to be aware of whether he was 119 fire fighters due to crynasium. The Defendant was booming the victim’s left hand and attempted to get out of the Defendant’s hand because the situation where the victim got out of the Defendant’s hand was repeated, which led to the victim’s left hand, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intention to interfere with emergency medical services by assaulting fire fighters dispatched to the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of the instant case erred by mistake of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 구급차 CCTV 영상 등 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거에 의하면, 피고인은 절도 혐의로 지구대에 연행되었다가, 갑자기 복통을 호소하여 경찰관이 119에 구급 요청을 하여 119 구급대가 출동하였던 사실, 피고인은 구급차 내에서 아픔을 호소하고 있기는 하나, 멀쩡히 눈을 뜨고 피해자를 바라보고, 손짓을 하고 말을 하는 등 정신을 잃은 것으로는 보이지 않고, 피해자는 파란색 비닐 재질의 방호복 안에 주황색 근무복을 입고 있었고, 이는 육안으로 확인이 가능하였던 사실, 피해자가 피고인이 왼손으로 피해자의 왼손을 잡는 것을 거부하고 피고인의 왼손을 피고인의 배 위에 올려놓은 다음 피해자의 왼손을 빼자, 피고인은 피해자를 바라보면서 살짝 몸을 일으키고 피고인의 왼손을 빠르게 바깥쪽으로 휘두름으로써 피해자의 왼쪽 얼굴 부위를 때린 사실이 확인된다.

Comprehensively taking account of such circumstances, the foregoing shall be deemed as follows.