1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,500,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from March 1, 2017 to July 26, 2018.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including paper numbers) and all the arguments.

On September 3, 2015, the Plaintiff received 660,000,000 won (including value-added tax) services from the Defendant to manage the migration of B-dong station area, station area, multi-family housing building projects, and to promote relocation and crime prevention projects, and completed the said services on February 2017.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant service contract”) B.

As the price for the instant service contract, the Defendant paid KRW 19,50,000 to the Plaintiff on November 25, 2016, KRW 230,00,000, KRW 198,000 on January 17, 2017, KRW 77,000 on May 30, 2017, KRW 55,000,000 on August 18, 2017, and KRW 560,000 on behalf of the Plaintiff on August 16, 2017, KRW 19,50,000 on behalf of the Plaintiff.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's assertion 579,500,000 won out of 660,000,000 won under the service contract of this case (i.e., 560,000 won by subrogation for the plaintiff) as seen in the above basic facts (i.e., 560,000 won by subrogation for the plaintiff). Thus, 80,500,000 won by subrogation for the plaintiff (i.e., 660,000 won by 579,500,000 won by 579,50,000 won by 579,50,000 won after the plaintiff completed the performance of the obligation under the service contract of this case, from March 1, 2017 to May 14, 2018; and (ii) the amount paid by the defendant to the plaintiff at the rate of 10,500,000 won by each of the above basic facts under the service contract of this case.

B. According to the evidence No. 2 of the judgment, the Defendant’s payment of KRW 50,00,000 to the Plaintiff under the instant service contract on January 20, 2017 is recognized. Therefore, the Defendant’s above assertion is with merit.