A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant shall pay 30,00 won to the applicant C, and 206.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court on December 23, 2015, which became final and conclusive on December 31, 2015 and is currently under suspended sentence.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 2126

1. Larceny;

A. On February 16, 2017, at the G convenience store operated by the victim E in Gangdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul, the Defendant stolen the victim’s cash holding 812,980 won, which was the victim’s possession during the payment period, while working as an employee at the victim E’s G convenience store operated by Gangdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul.

B. On April 29, 2017, at around 03:00 on April 29, 2017, the Defendant thefted the victim H with three copies of cash 70,000 won and KRW 30,000 gift certificates, which were owned by the victim during the payment period, while working as an employee at the J convenience store operated by the victim H in Gangdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul.

2. The accused, such as computer, etc., was in his possession of the crebs without the victim E while serving as an employee at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article.

T-moneoneoney card was set on the charging machine of transportation cards, and was charged by inputting information about 350,000 won to the computer in the calculating unit.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to 350,000 won by inputting information into a computer or any other information processing device without authority.

3. On March 24, 2017, at the Defendant’s house located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant puts a letter stating that “The Defendant sells to 16,000 won per 1box 1box” on the Internet’s website, which is the Internet trading site.

However, in fact, the defendant did not possess the above goods and did not think of consumption with gambling funds even if he received the price, so that he actually intended to sell the goods.