1. The Defendant’s KRW 19,118,600 and its weight to the Plaintiff:

(a) As regards KRW 5,752,600, April 4, 2013:

B. 4,868.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, as the party, concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff 1”), B vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff 2 vehicle”), and C vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff 3 vehicle”), respectively.

The defendant concluded a motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the freight vehicles D (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle").

B. (1) On January 13, 2013, E avoided the control time zone around 18:50, and loaded pine trees exceeding the loading capacity under the Road Traffic Act on the Defendant’s vehicle (for the Defendant’s vehicle, about 8.5m in total length, about 7m in length, while pine trees were about 20m in length). On the 7th west-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-do, the National Highway No. 7 located in the west-do, Gyeong-ri, Gyeong-ri, the length of which was about 8.5m in total, but about 7m in length was about 20m in length), the operation of the national road No. 1 in the west-do, the sloping-ri, and the central separation zone was collisioned on the bend side, and as a result, the pine trees on which the loaded trees

(B) The plaintiff 1, who was proceeding on the opposite lane, discovered pine trees away from the road, did so late, collisioned with the retaining wall, and then stopped on the road due to the collision of pine trees. The other vehicles remaining behind are also parked on the road without taking measures, such as dealing with the accident and reporting. The plaintiff 2, who was parked on the opposite lane, led to the collision of pine trees, and then the vehicle stopped on the road. However, the vehicle stopped by the plaintiff 2, who was parked on the road.

On the other hand, the plaintiff 3 vehicle, which was located in the direction of the progress of the defendant vehicle, did not properly see the front because of soil and dust scattered from pine drop, and conflict with the retaining wall and the central separation zone.

C. The Plaintiff paid insurance money pursuant to each of the above comprehensive car insurance contracts, and 8,218,000 won at the repair cost of Plaintiff 1’s vehicle on April 3, 2013, and 3,006,000 won at the repair cost of Plaintiff 2’s vehicle on April 1, 2013, and the Plaintiff on July 31, 2013.