A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

excessive one percent (No. 1) seized shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment by the Seoul Northern District Court for interference with the execution of official duties, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on February 22, 2015.

The defendant was residing in the "D Public Notice Board" located in the Gu Council city C, and the victim E (49 tax) resided in the above Public Notice Board and worked as the general secretary of the Public Notice Board.

On July 17, 2017, the Defendant, at the entrance of the above Gosiwon, 17:13 around July 17, 2017, sought the horses from the injured party while drinking alcohol while drinking, which are “no longer talking” from the injured party, and threatened the victim with the excessive amount of dangerous articles (19cm in length on the blade) being kept in his/her own plan, and the victim’s clothes as they are.

On the other hand, the Defendant continued to see the horses from the victim, and then put the victim’s jackets into the body of the damaged person and threatened the victim with other descendants who set up the above excessive damages as they are, and the victim resisted, and then, the victim flicked at one hand, flicked the victim’s neck, flicked the excessive damages into the body of the damaged person, and threatened the victim with the blick.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Police seizure records, seized articles and photographs thereof;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the personal confinement status, text of judgment and reply note;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283 (1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act lies in 17 criminal records of violence against the defendant, and commits a crime during the period of repeated crime; however, considering the fact that the defendant reflects the defendant's mistake in depth and that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim, etc.