(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.15 2013고단2651

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.15 2013고단2651

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B under the trade name of “C,” the main body of the horse game machine 19, 20, 20, 9, 3, and 3,000 screen pc., and the Defendant, D, and E are employees of the said game room.

1. B

A. A person who intends to conduct a game providing business must conduct the business with the permission of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu as prescribed by the Presidential Decree, but the said C run the game room business from November 20, 2012 to November 22:10, 2013 without obtaining permission.

B. A game product deemed to be a speculative game shall be classified by the Game Rating Board, and an unclassified game product shall not be provided for use or display or store for this purpose, the game product provided for the use of unspecified customers at the date, time, place, and the unclassified screen game at the time and place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a).

(c) no person shall engage in the business of exchanging, exchanging or re-purchasing tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of a game product, but shall, in the time, place, and place stated in the above paragraph (a), deduct 10% of the commission from those obtained 3,000 points or more through a horse game and exchange them to 135,000.

2. Defendants, D, E, D, and E agreed to receive KRW 5-60,00 per day from the above B, the owner of the game room business, from December 2012 to March 11, 2013, the said C agreed to receive an amount of money equivalent to KRW 5-60,00 per day, and assisted and abetted the game room business by being employed as an employee, against the owners and customers in the game room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against E, D, or B;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. The application of the law of seizure records, list of seizure, field photographs, appraisal results return(s) to the law shall be 1.1.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.01.10 2013고단2651 (2)

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.15 2013고단2651 (1)

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.22 2013고단2404 (1)

-서울서부지방법원 2013.05.30 2013노226

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.11.06 2014고단2194