Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits of this case are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The parties 1) The defendant is the defendant's 1, 134 apartment buildings (6,600 households) and 1 commercial building (324 stores; hereinafter "the commercial building of this case") on the ground of land C 1, 24 apartment buildings (6,600 households) and 324 of Songpa-gu Seoul.
(C) the apartment complex consisting of C 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment complex”).
(1) the reconstruction project of this case (hereinafter referred to as “instant reconstruction project”);
(2) Plaintiff A shared each of the instant stores with Plaintiff B by means of donation, etc. on December 24, 2002, when it divided ownership of Nos. 111 and 112 (hereinafter “each of the instant stores”).
B. The Defendant’s establishment and reconstruction resolution 1) The sectional owners of the apartment complex of this case are entitled to the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings on July 13, 2002 (hereinafter “Aggregate Buildings Act”).
)The Committee for Promotion of Fixed Apartments (hereinafter referred to as “Promotion Committee”) in lieu of the Managing Body’s meeting.
On May 24, 2003, an inaugural general meeting of the defendant's association was held and 4,280 of the 6,802 members of the total sectional owners actually attended or submitted "the inaugural general meeting document resolution" in lieu of the attendance at the meeting, which held the inaugural general meeting of the reconstruction association at the above inaugural general meeting (hereinafter referred to as "the primary rebuilding resolution").
(2) On June 12, 2003, the Defendant obtained the establishment authorization of the association from the head of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “the head of Songpa-gu”) and completed the establishment registration on July 15, 2003, and on July 1, 2003, the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) was enforced on July 1, 2003, it was considered as a housing reconstruction improvement project association pursuant to Article 10(1) of the Addenda of the same Act.
3. Subsequent to this, some of the members are to share the reconstruction cost.