logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.06.19 2013고정99
배임
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C around January 15, 2009, after receiving loans from the Industrial Bank of Korea located in the Bank of Korea in the Daegu-si Multi-Eup, Daegu-si, the Bank concluded a collateral security contract in an amount equivalent to KRW 498 million for the first time, and concluded a contract to establish the collateral security contract in an amount equivalent to KRW 80,800,000 for the first time to use the loan contract in accordance with the purpose of the collateral security contract, and to use it as the collateral security contract for the first time to avoid damage to the amount of the loan contract, and to use it as the collateral security contract for the first time to use it as the collateral security contract for the first time until the damages to the amount of the loan contract to the victim, the amount equivalent to KRW 84,800,000,000.

On February 2, 2011, the first patroler C, the Defendant, and E transferred the whole of the (main) D factories to the Defendant including the above machinery, but the transferee’s name was to be E.

around February 15, 2011, Defendant, C, and E sold to G the seller of machinery one of the following items: (a) D factory located in the Seongbuk-gun of Seongbuk, (b) C-Type Swan Press (250 tons); (c-Type Sak Press (200 tons); (b) two of C-Type Sringle Press (160 tons); (c-Type Sringle Press (110 tons); (b) one of C-Tpe Sringle Press (110 tons); and (c) one of the N.C Lever 1; and (c) one of the Air Common Ssor equipment 1 et al. sold to G total of KRW 210 million to G; and (c) sold the aforementioned 700 million appraised value of the machinery, which is one million won, to the seller of machinery, to inflict damage equivalent to KRW 131 billion.1 million.

Accordingly, in collusion with C and E, the Defendant acquired property benefits from breach of his duty, thereby causing damage to the principal.

Summary of Evidence

1. A prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused (Evidence No. 16);

1. The prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of C (Evidence No. 23) as to the defendant includes the defendant's liability D.

arrow