Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2017, the Defendant reported to the effect that his de facto spouse was addicted to alcohol, and that he would be required to be urgently hospitalized, and that he was dispatched to the residence of the Defendant in Suwon-gu C203 in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, the police officer called “the Defendant is a de facto spouse, so he is not entitled to a request for emergency hospitalization,” and then, he is allowed to be hospitalized in emergency with his lineal ascendant and descendant, family member of his de facto spouse.

“A de facto marriage spouse was unable to be immediately hospitalized after consultation, and the complaint was raised at the E box located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, 18:40 on the same day, and the Defendant’s cell phone and hand room, which was cited by his hand, directed F in the police box affiliated with the Defendant’s cell phone and hand room at the time of his/her service. During his/her process, he/she saw F to go against the said F’s arms. During his/her process, a computer monitor on his/her book was sealed in his/her hand, and was assaulted by his/her son who was in front of his/her table.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the situation service of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. On-site and damaged photographs;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from the F phone by a victim police officer);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (CCTV image data verification report);

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good in light of the method and attitude of the instant crime, and the Defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes. Furthermore, on April 27, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months by imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Suwon Franchising Board.