1. The Defendants: (a) on December 31, 2015, with respect to each of the final inheritance shares in the attached Form among the 46§³ in Tong-si, Tong-si.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the Plaintiff, Defendant G, and Defendant I, and between the Plaintiff and Defendant J are recognized by the purport of the entire statements and arguments as to the evidence Nos. 1 and 12. The remaining Defendants are deemed to have led to confessions pursuant to Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act among the Plaintiff and the remaining Defendants.

A. On December 4, 1950, P related to land possession completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale on November 30, 1950 with respect to 46 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

Q’s purchase of the instant land from P, but did not complete the registration of ownership transfer, Q obtained possession of the instant land from the Annex around December 31, 1995, and has occupied the building on that ground.

On March 20, 2013, the Plaintiff purchased the instant land and buildings unregistered on its ground from Q and resided therein.

B. The parties-related P died on March 7, 1967.

The heir had been wife R, children S, T, U, and Defendant B, but R died on November 20, 1985.

S married with Defendant C, and had Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, and Defendant H as his child, and died on October 12, 2015.

T had Defendant I, Defendant J, and Defendant K as his child by marriage with V, and died on November 6, 2009.

U married with Defendant L to have Defendant M and Defendant N as his child, and died on March 9, 1983.

The defendants, the heir of the network P, have the final inheritance shares as shown in the present annexed sheet.

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the registration of transfer of P’s ownership is maintained from December 4, 1950 to the date of closing of argument in this case as to the land in this case, and the Plaintiff occupied the land in this case after Q succeeded to the possession of the land in this case from Q to the date of closing of argument in this case. Each of the above possession is the peace and performance based on its own intent