beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 29, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Seoul Central District Court to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a summary order of KRW 2.5 million from the Seoul Central District Court to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) on April 29, 2008, respectively.
Nevertheless, at around 05:04 on June 6, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.15% of blood alcohol level 0.15%, and the Defendant driven Bchier car at approximately 20 meters from the front of the entertainment bars in front of the entertainment bars in the Seo-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul to the front of the 117th street.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Notification of the circumstantial report, details of enforcement, and control results of drinking driving;
1. [Korean Criminal Records]: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries and inquiries, such as criminal records;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, was sentenced to four times or more as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from 2001 to 2008 prior to the instant case.
In addition, the traffic-related crimes such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unauthorized Measures after Accidents) have been punished several times.
Nevertheless, the crime of this case in the same kind as the second one has been committed, and the blood alcohol concentration is also 0.155%.
Furthermore, around January 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended execution, probation and community service order, etc. in the Seoul Southern District Court for embezzlement, and committed the instant crime during the suspended execution period, which should be well known.
Considering this point, as the responsibility of the defendant is very significant, a sentence equivalent thereto is inevitable.
However, the driving distance shown in the facts charged is about 20 meters.