Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2015, the Defendant, at around 10:40, committed an indecent act against the victim at the 9th Emphal of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the victim D (V, 42 years old), who was in front, was her hand at the place of public smuggling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Fines for Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Where a conviction of a defendant against a sex offense subject to registration becomes final and conclusive with respect to the judgment that constitutes a sex offense subject to registration under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to a related agency pursuant

In order to exempt a defendant from an order to disclose personal information, taking into account the defendant's age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type and motive of the crime, process of the crime, seriousness of the crime, preventive effect of the sexual crime that can be achieved through an order to disclose information, disadvantage of the defendant, etc., no order to disclose and notify personal information registered pursuant to the proviso to Article 49 (1) and the proviso to Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse

Reasons for sentencing

1. The sentencing criteria are not set for the crimes indicated in the judgment;

2. Although the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, considering that the Defendant’s attitude of committing the instant crime is relatively weak, and that the Defendant recognizes and reflects the Defendant’s crime, and that the Defendant does not have the same power, a fine like the order shall be imposed.