(영문) 대구지방법원상주지원 2016.01.27 2015가단242

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원상주지원 2016.01.27 2015가단242

매매대금반환

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Around January 2015, Defendant B posted a notice on Defendant B’s Track sales box, along with his phone number, posted a letter to the effect that Defendant B would sell a Track (such as a Track: D; hereinafter referred to as “Tracker”) more than the Gu owned by the Defendant at the sales site of the secondhand agricultural machinery.

B. The plaintiff and the defendant B’s telephone conversations between the plaintiff and the defendant, and the defendant B’s 1) who cannot be identified as the present person (hereinafter referred to as “the plaintiff”)

On January 14, 2015, Defendant B made a telephone to ask the status of the black land and received a few copies of the black land. 2) On the same day, the French phone calls the Plaintiff operating the agricultural machinery repair and sales business, etc., and calls the Plaintiff to purchase the black land up to what is possible, and the Plaintiff expressed his intention to purchase the black land in KRW 35 million at the end of talking about the status and price of the black land.

3) On January 15, 2015, on the following day, the Buddhistist called the Defendant B by phone and sent it to the Defendant B, and called “the Tracter purchaser. The buyer will go to the 4:0 p.m. between 4:00 p.m. and 5:0 p.m.: Provided, however, the buyer is the article that the Tracter (Defendant B) does not become the Tracter owner, and only he does not speak the actual Tracter price.” On the same day, the Bacctor may be seen as the Tractor by phone to the Plaintiff at the Actera Hospital. The Hactor calls the Plaintiff at the same day, and then sent it to the Macter. The promise would be sent on behalf of the staff.” The Plaintiff and Defendant B agreed on the Macler’s speech and behavior as above, and all of the Macler’s commitments took place on January 17, 2015:00 p.m.

C. The plaintiff and the defendant B, who were only the plaintiff and the defendant B, were the plaintiff.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고정2821

-부산지방법원 2017.02.21 2016고단6725

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.10.18 2018고단480

-서울남부지방법원 2017.07.18 2017고단1981

-인천지방법원 2021.02.08 2020고단8981